Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2026; 17(8): 122101
Published online Aug 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.122101
Published online Aug 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.122101
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and biochemical (ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus vs type 2 diabetes mellitus), n (%)/median (interquartile rage)/mean ± SD
| Parameter | KP-T2DM (n = 146) | T2DM (n = 93) | P value |
| Male | 115 (78.8) | 65 (69.2) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 32 | 44 (34-51) | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.10 (22.90-28.62) | 23.88 (22.49-26.28) | 0.037 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 14.37 ± 3.75 | 12.73 ± 4.13 | 0.001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 12.10 ± 2.21 | 10.87 ± 2.12 | < 0.001 |
| FCP (ng/mL) | 0.70 (0.36-0.93) | 1.20 (0.61-1.51) | < 0.001 |
| 2hCP (ng/mL) | 1.67 (1.02-2.02) | 2.71 (1.46-3.13) | < 0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 2.78 (1.63-5.34) | 1.95 (1.23-3.11) | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.85 (0.75-0.88) | 0.91 (0.78-1.00) | 0.005 |
| ALP (U/L) | 114.5 (87.8-134.7) | 86.1 (68.0-97.5) | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression for ketosis onset
| Variable | OR | 95%CI | P value |
| Age (per year) | 0.954 | 0.92-0.99 | 0.016 |
| Weight (per kg) | 1.074 | 1.03-1.12 | 0.002 |
| FPG (per mmol/L) | 1.420 | 1.24-1.63 | < 0.001 |
| FCP (per ng/mL) | 0.193 | 0.07-0.51 | < 0.001 |
| FT3 (per pg/mL) | 0.118 | 0.04-0.32 | < 0.001 |
| ALP (per U/L) | 1.016 | 1.00-1.03 | 0.024 |
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic analysis for predicting ketosis onset in type 2 diabetes mellitus
| Variable | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Optimal cut-off | P value |
| Age (years) | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 40.50 | < 0.001 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 11.12 | < 0.001 |
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.91 | 2.70 | < 0.001 |
| ALP (U/L) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 89.40 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Baseline characteristics and biochemical (latent autoimmune diabetes in adult vs ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus), n (%)/ median (interquartile rage)/mean ± SD
| Parameter | LADA (n = 55) | KP-T2DM (n = 146) | P value |
| Male | 29 (52.7) | 115 (78.8) | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 32 | 32 | 0.772 |
| Weight (kg) | 55 | 75 | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.20 (18.36-22.14) | 25.10 (22.90-28.62) | < 0.001 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 114.07 ± 16.55 | 126.17 ± 16.35 | < 0.001 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 74.82 ± 11.39 | 81.60 ± 12.52 | < 0.001 |
| FCP (ng/mL) | 0.30 (0.15-0.46) | 0.70 (0.36-0.93) | < 0.001 |
| 2hCP (ng/mL) | 0.64 (0.37-0.80) | 1.67 (1.02-2.02) | < 0.001 |
| HOMA-β (C-peptide) | 8.10 (3.83-15.99) | 15.70 (7.47-28.32) | < 0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (C-peptide) | 2.85 (2.23-3.81) | 4.47 (3.14-6.24) | < 0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.64 (1.13-2.62) | 2.78 (1.63-5.34) | 0.003 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.04 (0.97-1.08) | 0.85 (0.75-0.88) | 0.018 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.60 (2.54-2.60) | 2.97 (2.55-3.19) | 0.011 |
| ALP (U/L) | 100.40 (85.20-119.00) | 114.51 (87.75-134.65) | 0.047 |
| GGT (U/L) | 20.20 (14.80-25.80) | 44.65 (22.85-56.15) | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression for latent autoimmune diabetes in adult vs ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus
| Variable | OR | 95%CI | P value |
| 2hCP (per ng/mL) | 17.89 | 4.96-64.45 | < 0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (C-peptide) | 0.68 | 0.51-0.91 | 0.010 |
| HDL-C (per mmol/L) | 0.00 | 0.00-0.02 | < 0.001 |
| LDL-C (per mmol/L) | 2.47 | 1.16-5.27 | 0.019 |
| GGT (per U/L) | 1.05 | 1.01-1.09 | 0.014 |
Table 6 Receiver operating characteristic analysis for differentiating latent autoimmune diabetes in adult from ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus
| Variable | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Optimal cut-off | P value |
| 2hCP (ng/mL) | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.77 | < 0.98 | < 0.001 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.86 | > 1.03 | < 0.001 |
| GGT (U/L) | 0.79 | 0.95 | 0.56 | < 37.85 | < 0.001 |
| HOMA-IR (C-peptide) | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.61 | < 4.01 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Pei SQ, Ren JL, Zhang L, Gao YX, Yang X, Liu X, Li SN, Liu P, Xu XY. Non-antibody biomarkers for differentiating ketosis-onset diabetes: A retrospective study. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 122101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v17/i8/122101.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.122101