BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2026; 17(6): 118576
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.118576
Table 1 Multimodal perfusion assessment toolbox for patients with diabetic foot ulcer undergoing anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction
Modality
Physiological target
Core quantitative readouts
Key strengths in DFU/ALT flap setting
Major limitations/sources of bias
Recommended role in an integrated workflow
ICG-FA: Static intensitySuperficial microvascular fillingRelative intensity, perfused area ratioReal-time intraoperative “perfusion map”; margin tailoring; identifies gross hypoperfusionHighly sensitive to camera gain/distance, ambient light, ICG dose/injection, tissue thickness/edema; intensity saturation/poolingScreening/visual guidance only; avoid using a single brightness snapshot as a stand-alone threshold in DFU
ICG-FA: Time-intensity kinetics (FTC metrics)Dynamic inflow/outflow kineticsWash-in slope, Tmax, AUC, Fmax, half-time, washoutMore robust to device settings than static intensity; supports reproducibility; captures “exchange efficiency” beyond brightnessStill affected by ROI selection, timing, motion, and protocol heterogeneity; requires standardized acquisition and curve extractionPrimary quantitative layer for intraoperative decision support; should be standardized and validated against outcomes
Toe pressure/TBIDistal macrocirculatory capacity (digital arteries)Toe pressure (mmHg), toe-brachial indexLess distorted by medial arterial calcification than ABI; linked to healing/amputation riskToe deformity, ulcer location, temperature, pain; not intraoperative-real timeBaseline distal inflow gatekeeper; interpret ICG-FA within the “distal capacity” context
SPPMicrovascular perfusion reserve (skin)SPP (mmHg)Useful when toe pressure unavailable; healing prediction utilityOperator dependence; site-specific; not continuousPre-op ischemia stratification and post-revascularization reassessment
TcPO2Tissue oxygenation (skin oxygen diffusion)TcPO2 (mmHg)Strong wound-healing prediction literature in DFU; anchors perfusion to oxygen deliveryPlacement/temperature/thickness sensitive; slower response; limited intraoperative feedbackOxygenation “ground-truth” adjunct to interpret ICG-FA and plan revascularization/optimization
NIRS/tissue oximetryLocal hemoglobin oxygen saturationStO2 trends, desaturation eventsEarly warning for perfusion compromise; continuous monitoring potentialDevice/probe variability; thresholds not standardized; depth limitedContinuous trend monitoring peri-/post-op; complements ICG-FA kinetics
LDF/LDISuperficial microvascular flow (RBC flux)PU, spectral indicesDetects microvascular dysregulation; noninvasiveMotion artifacts; small sampling area; limited depthMicrocirculation trend assessment; research/adjunct use
LSCISuperficial perfusion mappingRelative perfusion maps, flow indexWide-field perfusion mapping; can complement ICG-FASusceptible to motion/Lighting; standardization neededCross-validation of ICG-FA in centers with capability
Doppler waveform (handheld/duplex)Arterial hemodynamicsWaveform morphology; velocity indicesAdds hemodynamic context; supports PAD gradingRequires expertise; may miss microvascular failureMacrovascular characterization together with toe pressure/TBI/SPP/TcPO2
FLIRSurface temperature proxy for perfusionTemperature gradients, thermal asymmetryRapid, non-contact; potential adjunct with TcPO2Confounded by ambient temp, inflammation, dressings; indirect markerAdjunct screening, especially when paired with TcPO2 in angiosome-based assessment
Table 2 Proposed minimum reporting set for standardized quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in diabetic foot ulcer anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction
Reporting domain
Minimum items to report (recommended)
Why it matters
Outcome anchoring
Patient and limb ischemia phenotypeDiabetes duration/type; PAD history; prior revascularization (type, timing); ulcer location/angiosome; infection statusBaseline heterogeneity strongly shapes perfusion signals and failure riskStratify analyses by ischemia phenotype and revascularization status
Distal perfusion capacity (pre-op baseline)Toe pressure/TBI, SPP, TcPO2 (site, temperature settings, timing); Doppler waveformInterprets ICG-FA within a “distal capacity ceiling”; mitigates ABI distortion in medial calcificationUse clinically meaningful thresholds and report proportion meeting targets
ICG agent and administrationICG dose (mg/kg), concentration, injection rate/flush volume, injection site, repeat-injection intervalDose/rate substantially change curve shape and saturation; critical for reproducibilityReport adverse reactions; document repeated runs and reasons
Imaging system and acquisition settingsDevice model; excitation/emission band; working distance; gain/exposure; frame rate; ambient light control; start time relative to injectionControls systematic measurement drift across platforms and casesProvide calibration/QA steps if available
ROI definition rulesROI anatomical landmarks; size/shape; number of ROIs (central vs peripheral, suspected hypoperfusion zones); method for background subtractionROI selection is a dominant source of between-study variabilityPredefine ROI plan; avoid “post-hoc ROI fishing”
Primary kinetic parameters (FTC-based)Wash-in slope; Tmax; AUC; Fmax; time-to-10%/90% rise (if used); normalization methodKinetic metrics are less sensitive than intensity-only metrics and reflect inflow/exchange dynamicsSpecify how curves are extracted (software, smoothing, interpolation)
Decision rules during surgeryCriteria for margin trimming, re-anastomosis, supercharging, warming/vasodilator use; whether decisions were blinded to kineticsEnables evaluation of clinical utility and prevents circular reasoningLink each decision to subsequent necrosis/complication endpoints
Systemic physiology at imagingMAP/vasopressors; temperature; hemoglobin; SpO2/PaO2; PaCO2/ventilation strategy; fluid balanceICG-FA reflects a systemic-regional-microcirculatory continuum; systemic variables confound kineticsReport concurrent systemic targets and deviations
Comparator modalities (if available)NIRS StO2 trends; TcPO2/TcPCO2; LDF/LSCI; thermographyMultimodal validation improves credibility and mechanistic inferencePredefine primary/secondary validation endpoints
Clinical endpointsPartial/total flap necrosis (definition, timing); take-back/re-exploration; wound healing time; limb salvage; LOSAvoids endpoint heterogeneity, enabling meta-analysis/registry utilityMandatory follow-up window and adjudication process


Write to the Help Desk