Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2026; 17(6): 118576
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.118576
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.118576
Table 1 Multimodal perfusion assessment toolbox for patients with diabetic foot ulcer undergoing anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction
| Modality | Physiological target | Core quantitative readouts | Key strengths in DFU/ALT flap setting | Major limitations/sources of bias | Recommended role in an integrated workflow |
| ICG-FA: Static intensity | Superficial microvascular filling | Relative intensity, perfused area ratio | Real-time intraoperative “perfusion map”; margin tailoring; identifies gross hypoperfusion | Highly sensitive to camera gain/distance, ambient light, ICG dose/injection, tissue thickness/edema; intensity saturation/pooling | Screening/visual guidance only; avoid using a single brightness snapshot as a stand-alone threshold in DFU |
| ICG-FA: Time-intensity kinetics (FTC metrics) | Dynamic inflow/outflow kinetics | Wash-in slope, Tmax, AUC, Fmax, half-time, washout | More robust to device settings than static intensity; supports reproducibility; captures “exchange efficiency” beyond brightness | Still affected by ROI selection, timing, motion, and protocol heterogeneity; requires standardized acquisition and curve extraction | Primary quantitative layer for intraoperative decision support; should be standardized and validated against outcomes |
| Toe pressure/TBI | Distal macrocirculatory capacity (digital arteries) | Toe pressure (mmHg), toe-brachial index | Less distorted by medial arterial calcification than ABI; linked to healing/amputation risk | Toe deformity, ulcer location, temperature, pain; not intraoperative-real time | Baseline distal inflow gatekeeper; interpret ICG-FA within the “distal capacity” context |
| SPP | Microvascular perfusion reserve (skin) | SPP (mmHg) | Useful when toe pressure unavailable; healing prediction utility | Operator dependence; site-specific; not continuous | Pre-op ischemia stratification and post-revascularization reassessment |
| TcPO2 | Tissue oxygenation (skin oxygen diffusion) | TcPO2 (mmHg) | Strong wound-healing prediction literature in DFU; anchors perfusion to oxygen delivery | Placement/temperature/thickness sensitive; slower response; limited intraoperative feedback | Oxygenation “ground-truth” adjunct to interpret ICG-FA and plan revascularization/optimization |
| NIRS/tissue oximetry | Local hemoglobin oxygen saturation | StO2 trends, desaturation events | Early warning for perfusion compromise; continuous monitoring potential | Device/probe variability; thresholds not standardized; depth limited | Continuous trend monitoring peri-/post-op; complements ICG-FA kinetics |
| LDF/LDI | Superficial microvascular flow (RBC flux) | PU, spectral indices | Detects microvascular dysregulation; noninvasive | Motion artifacts; small sampling area; limited depth | Microcirculation trend assessment; research/adjunct use |
| LSCI | Superficial perfusion mapping | Relative perfusion maps, flow index | Wide-field perfusion mapping; can complement ICG-FA | Susceptible to motion/Lighting; standardization needed | Cross-validation of ICG-FA in centers with capability |
| Doppler waveform (handheld/duplex) | Arterial hemodynamics | Waveform morphology; velocity indices | Adds hemodynamic context; supports PAD grading | Requires expertise; may miss microvascular failure | Macrovascular characterization together with toe pressure/TBI/SPP/TcPO2 |
| FLIR | Surface temperature proxy for perfusion | Temperature gradients, thermal asymmetry | Rapid, non-contact; potential adjunct with TcPO2 | Confounded by ambient temp, inflammation, dressings; indirect marker | Adjunct screening, especially when paired with TcPO2 in angiosome-based assessment |
Table 2 Proposed minimum reporting set for standardized quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in diabetic foot ulcer anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction
| Reporting domain | Minimum items to report (recommended) | Why it matters | Outcome anchoring |
| Patient and limb ischemia phenotype | Diabetes duration/type; PAD history; prior revascularization (type, timing); ulcer location/angiosome; infection status | Baseline heterogeneity strongly shapes perfusion signals and failure risk | Stratify analyses by ischemia phenotype and revascularization status |
| Distal perfusion capacity (pre-op baseline) | Toe pressure/TBI, SPP, TcPO2 (site, temperature settings, timing); Doppler waveform | Interprets ICG-FA within a “distal capacity ceiling”; mitigates ABI distortion in medial calcification | Use clinically meaningful thresholds and report proportion meeting targets |
| ICG agent and administration | ICG dose (mg/kg), concentration, injection rate/flush volume, injection site, repeat-injection interval | Dose/rate substantially change curve shape and saturation; critical for reproducibility | Report adverse reactions; document repeated runs and reasons |
| Imaging system and acquisition settings | Device model; excitation/emission band; working distance; gain/exposure; frame rate; ambient light control; start time relative to injection | Controls systematic measurement drift across platforms and cases | Provide calibration/QA steps if available |
| ROI definition rules | ROI anatomical landmarks; size/shape; number of ROIs (central vs peripheral, suspected hypoperfusion zones); method for background subtraction | ROI selection is a dominant source of between-study variability | Predefine ROI plan; avoid “post-hoc ROI fishing” |
| Primary kinetic parameters (FTC-based) | Wash-in slope; Tmax; AUC; Fmax; time-to-10%/90% rise (if used); normalization method | Kinetic metrics are less sensitive than intensity-only metrics and reflect inflow/exchange dynamics | Specify how curves are extracted (software, smoothing, interpolation) |
| Decision rules during surgery | Criteria for margin trimming, re-anastomosis, supercharging, warming/vasodilator use; whether decisions were blinded to kinetics | Enables evaluation of clinical utility and prevents circular reasoning | Link each decision to subsequent necrosis/complication endpoints |
| Systemic physiology at imaging | MAP/vasopressors; temperature; hemoglobin; SpO2/PaO2; PaCO2/ventilation strategy; fluid balance | ICG-FA reflects a systemic-regional-microcirculatory continuum; systemic variables confound kinetics | Report concurrent systemic targets and deviations |
| Comparator modalities (if available) | NIRS StO2 trends; TcPO2/TcPCO2; LDF/LSCI; thermography | Multimodal validation improves credibility and mechanistic inference | Predefine primary/secondary validation endpoints |
| Clinical endpoints | Partial/total flap necrosis (definition, timing); take-back/re-exploration; wound healing time; limb salvage; LOS | Avoids endpoint heterogeneity, enabling meta-analysis/registry utility | Mandatory follow-up window and adjudication process |
- Citation: Lu PY, Hao ZY, Xing GW, Zhang PF, Liu YS, Li WY, Xu MJ. Improving intraoperative perfusion reliability in anterolateral thigh free flap reconstruction for diabetic foot ulcers. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(6): 118576
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v17/i6/118576.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.118576