BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2026; 17(6): 116477
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.116477
Table 1 Summary of findings from the cardiovascular outcome trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists[16,27-29,52-54]

EXSCEL[27]
ELIXA[28]
LEADER[29]
REWIND[30]
HARMONY[31]
SUSTAIN-6[32]
PIONEER-6[33]
InterventionExenatide once weekly subcutaneous vs placeboOnce-daily subcutaneous lixisenatide vs placeboOnce daily subcutaneous liraglutide vs placeboWeekly subcutaneous dulaglutide vs placeboWeekly subcutaneous albiglutide vs placeboOnce-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placeboOnce-daily oral semaglutide vs placebo
Population (n)14752606893409901946332973183
Established CV disease (%)73.110081.331.51008384.7
Follow-up period (years), (median IQR)3.2 (2.2 to 4.4)2.13.85.41.6 (1.3 to 2)2.11.3
Mean/median HbA1c at baseline (%)87.68.77.28.78.78.2
Mean difference in HbA1c (%), (95%CI)-0.53 (-0.57 to -0.50)-0.27 (-0.31 to -0.22)-0.40 (-0.45 to -0.34)-0.61 (-0.65 to -0.58)-0.52 (-0.58 to -0.45)-0.7 (-0.80 to -0.52) for a 0.5 mg/week dose-1 (-1.19 to -0.91) for a 1 mg/week dose-0.7% (-0.42 to -1.26)
Mean difference in body weight (kg), (95%CI)-1.27 (-1.4 to -1.13)-0.7 (-0.9 to -0.5)-2.3 (-2.5 to -2)-1.46 (-1.67 to -1.25)-0.83 (-1.06 to -0.6)-2.9 (-3.47 to -2.28) for a 0.5 mg/week dose-4.3 (-4.94 to -3.75) for a 1 mg/week dose-3.4 (-4.2 to -2.3)
Mean difference in systolic blood pressure (mmHg), (95%CI)Not reported−0.8 (-1.3 to -0.3)-1.2 (-1.9 to 0.5)-1·70 (-1.33 to -2.07)–0.67 (-1.40 to 0.06)-1.3 (P = 0.10) for 0.5 mg/week dose, -2.6 (P < 0.001) in 1.0 mg/week dose-2.6 (-3.7 to -1.5)
Primary outcome, HR (95%CI)3P-MACE, 0.91 (0.83 to 1.0) P < 0.001 for noninferiority, P = 0.06 for superiority4P-MACE, 1.02 (0.89 to 1.17) P = 0.813P-MACE, 0.87 (0.78 to 0.97), P = 0.01 for superiority13P-MACE, 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99), P = 0.026 for superiority13P-MACE, 0.78 (0.68 to 0.90), P = 0.0006 for superiority13P-MACE, 0.74 (0.58 to 0.95), P = 0.02 for superiority13P-MACE, 0.79 (0.57 to 1.11)
Key secondary outcomes
CV death, HR (95%CI)0.88 (0.76 to 1.02)0.98 (0.78 to 1.22)0.78 (0.66 to 0.93), P = 0.00710.91 (0.78 to 1.06)0.93 (0.73 to 1.19)0.98 (0.65 to 1.48)0.49 (0.27 to 0.92)
All-cause mortality, HR (95%CI)0.86 (0.77 to 0.97)0.94 (0.78 to 1.13)0.85 (0.74 to 0.97), P = 0.0210.90 (0.80 to 1.01)0.95 (0.79 to 1.16)1.05 (0.74 to 1.50)0.51 (0.31 to 0.84)
Non-fatal myocardial infarction, HR (95%CI)0.97 (0.85 to 1.10)1.03 (0.87 to 1.22), P = 0.710.86 (0.73 to 1.00), P = 0.04610.96 (0.79 to 1.15)0.75 (0.61 to 0.90), P = 0.00310.74 (0.51 to 1.08)1.18 (0.73 to 1.90)
Non-fatal stroke, HR (95%CI)0.85 (0.70 to 1.03)1.12 (0.79 to 1.58)0.86 (0.71 to 1.06)0.76 (0.62 to 0.94), P = 0.0110.86 (0.66 to 1.14)0.61 (0.38 to 0.99), P = 0.0410.74 (0.35 to 1.57)
Hospitalization for HF, HR (95%CI)0.94 (0.78 to 1.13)0.96 (0.75 to 1.23)0.87 (0.73 to 1.05)0.93 (0.77 to 1.12)0.85 (0.64 to 1.11)1.11 (0.77 to 1.61)0.86 (0.48 to 1.55)
Adverse effectsNo clinically relevant between-group differencesLeading to discontinuation (11.4% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). GI events (4.9% vs 1.2%), P < 0.0011GI events were more frequent in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group. Acute gallstone disease (3.1% vs 1.9%), P < 0.0011. Pancreatic carcinoma (0.3% vs 0.1%), P = 0.061GI events (47.4% vs 34.1%), P < 0.00011Injection site reactions (2% vs 1%)Retinopathy complications 1.76 (1.11 to 2.78), P = 0.021. GI disorders are more common in the semaglutide arms vs the placeboTreatment discontinuation and GI events were more common in the semaglutide than the placebo group


Write to the Help Desk