Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2016; 8(20): 777-784
Published online Dec 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.777
Published online Dec 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.777
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Patients | n |
Male, % | 846, 60% |
Age, median (range) | 73 (12-99) |
Native papilla | 668, 47.6% |
Indication | |
Malignancy | 522 |
Choledocholithiasis | 771 |
Others | 110 |
Cannulation time, median (range) | 5 min (1-185) |
Procedure time, median | 37 min (3-185) |
2 h amylase | 97 IU/mL (10-3502) |
median (range) | |
ERCP and related procedures | |
Total ERCP | 1403 |
ENBD | 362 |
EBS | 380 |
EMS | 42 |
EPS | 124 |
Precut | 35 |
EST | 505 |
EPBD | 20 |
EPLBD | 38 |
Pancreatic duct brush | 15 |
Table 2 Complications
Complications | n, % (95%CI) |
Bleeding | 8, 0.57 (0.28-1.12) |
Perforation | 5, 0.35 (0.15-0.83) |
Pancreatitis (severe pancreatitis) | 55, 3.9 (3.02-5.07) [3, 0.2 (0.073-0.64)] |
Procedure-related death | 0, 0 |
Table 3 Univariate analysis of pancreatitis predictors
Predictors | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
Sex (female) | 0.53 | 0.31-0.92 | 0.0245 |
Native papilla | 5.62 | 2.73-11.6 | < 0.0001 |
ENBD | 0.77 | 0.43-1.38 | 0.4313 |
EBS1 | 2.62 | 1.18-5.85 | 0.0129 |
EMS | 0.37 | 0.13-1.08 | 0.0784 |
EPS | 0.47 | 0.22-1.00 | 0.0528 |
Precut | 0.23 | 0.08-0.61 | 0.0102 |
EST | 0.49 | 0.28-0.84 | 0.0099 |
EPBD | 0.22 | 0.06-0.78 | 0.0405 |
EPLBD | - | - | 0.3983 |
Pancreatic duct brush | 6.42 | 1.75-23.5 | 0.0186 |
2-h amylase ≥ 2 times ULN | 36.6 | 17.6-76.3 | < 0.0001 |
Cannulation time ≥ 13 min | 5.82 | 3.33-10.2 | < 0.0001 |
Procedure time ≥ 54 min | 4.70 | 2.70-8.18 | < 0.0001 |
Table 4 Age-adjusted multivariate analysis of pancreatitis predictors
Predictors | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
Sex (female) | 1.46 | 0.77-2.75 | 0.2431 |
Native papilla | 1.78 | 0.75-4.48 | 0.1908 |
Endoscopic biliary stent | 0.61 | 0.23-1.45 | 0.2810 |
Precut | 1.71 | 0.43-6.00 | 0.4288 |
EST | 1.18 | 0.60-2.35 | 0.6278 |
EPBD | 1.94 | 0.34-8.91 | 0.4296 |
Pancreatic duct brush | 3.15 | 0.54-15.5 | 0.1870 |
2 h amylase ≥ 2 times ULN | 25.4 | 12.2-59.9 | < 0.0001 |
Cannulation time ≥ 13 min | 2.63 | 1.34-5.23 | 0.0051 |
Procedure time ≥ 54 min | 1.23 | 0.389-3.67 | 0.7183 |
Table 5 Previous reports of hourly variations in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography amylase levels
Ref. | Year | n | Time1(h) | Amylasecut off | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Definition of PEP |
LaFerla et al[23] | 1986 | 20 | 2 | 800 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | Unlikely | Amy > 1200 |
Gottlieb et al[24] | 1996 | 231 | 2 | 276 | 82 | 76 | 15 | 98 | Consensus criteria |
Testoni et al[25] | 1999 | 409 | 2 | 5 × | 23.1 | 98.2 | 46.2 | 94.9 | Amy > 5 × ULN |
4 | 5 × | 53.8 | 95 | 42.4 | 96.8 | ||||
8 | 5 × | 76.9 | 96.9 | 62.5 | 98.4 | ||||
Testoni et al[26] | 2001 | 1185 | 6-8 | 3 × | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 100 | Pancreatic type pain |
Thomas et al[27] | 2001 | 263 | 4 | 2 × | 90 | 92.9 | 24.3 | 99.6 | Consensus criteria |
4 | 3 × | 70 | 95.3 | 36.8 | 98.8 | ||||
Kapetanos et al[28] | 2007 | 97 | 2 | 3 × | 72 | 79 | 32 | 95 | Consensus criteria |
6 | 3 × | 82 | 75 | 30 | 97 | ||||
Ito et al[16] | 2007 | 1291 | 3 | 3 × | 77 | n.d. | 29 | n.d. | Amy > 1 × ULN, |
6 | 3 × | 85 | n.d. | 24 | n.d. | with pain at 24 h | |||
Nishino et al[29] | 2009 | 1631 | 4 | 3 × | 89.8 | 72.9 | 12.7 | 99.4 | Consensus criteria |
4 | 4 × | 84.7 | 80.4 | 16 | 99.2 | ||||
Artifon et al[30] | 2010 | 300 | 4 | 1.5 × | 77 | 63 | 26 | 94 | Consensus criteria |
Sutton et al[15] | 2011 | 959 | 4 | 2.5 ×2 | 80 | 80.4 | 11.1 | 99.2 | Consensus criteria |
4 | 2.5 ×3 | 100 | 91.8 | 4.3 | 100 | (mod/severe only) | |||
Our study | 2015 | 1403 | 2 | 2 × | 85.5 | 85.8 | 19.8 | 99.3 | Consensus criteria |
2 | 2 ×4 | 96.4 | 68.8 | 11.2 | 99.8 |
- Citation: Hayashi S, Nishida T, Shimakoshi H, Shimoda A, Amano T, Sugimoto A, Takahashi K, Mukai K, Matsubara T, Yamamoto M, Nakajima S, Fukui K, Inada M. Combination of two-hour post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography amylase levels and cannulation times is useful for predicting post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(20): 777-784
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i20/777.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.777