Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 10, 2016; 8(1): 13-22
Published online Jan 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13
Published online Jan 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13
Table 1 Published literature reporting endoscopic through-the-scope clip closure for oesophageal perforations
| Ref. | Cause | Size/mm | Time to treatment | Im/Tm/Tp | Method | Nr | Clinical success | Additional treatment | Hospital stay /d | Follow-up |
| Wewalka et al[7] | Perforation (1) | < 10 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 1/1 (100%) | None | ND | ND | |
| Rodella et al[44] | Leak (7) | 10-20 | > 24 | ND | Endoclip | ND | 2/7 (14%) | Yes | ND | 9.6 mo avg. |
| van Bodegraven et al[57] | Fistula (1) | 12 | > 24 | ND | Endoclip + argon beam electrocoagulation | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | 7 mo |
| Cipolletta et al[8] | Perforation (2) | 7-8 | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 5 | 9 mo |
| 10 | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 2 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 6 | 14 mo | ||
| Shimamoto et al[50] | Perforation (1) | 20 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 3 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 37 | ND |
| Abe et al[58] | Perforation (1) | 5 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 36 | ND |
| Mizobuchi et al[59] | Fistula (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | > 31 | ND |
| Raymer et al[9] | Fistula (3) | ≤ 25 | > 24 | Tm/Tp | Endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | ND | ND |
| > 24 | Tm/Tp | Endoclip + surgery | ND | Yes | ND | ND | ||||
| > 24 | Tm/Tp | ND | Yes | ND | ND | |||||
| Shimizu et al[10] | Perforation (3) | 8/10/2008 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | 14 | ND |
| Schubert et al[60] | Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Stent + endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 1 mo |
| Wehrmann et al[45] | Perforation (4) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 4/4 (100%) | Yes | 9-22 | 12 mo |
| Leak (3) | ND | > 24 | Tm | Endoscopic lavage + endoclip | ND | 3/3 (100%) | Yes | |||
| Matsuda et al[46] | Perforation (1) | 25 | < 24 | Im | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | No | ND | ND |
| Sriram et al[11] | Perforation (1) | 10 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | ND |
| Fischer et al[61] | Perforation (4) | 20-40 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 2-6 | 4/4 (100%) | No | 7-18 | No |
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | No | No | ||||||
| Gerke et al[62] | Perforation (1) | 15 | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 3 + 1 | 1/1 (100%) | No | 7 | 6 mo |
| Qadeer et al[28] | Fistula (1) | 3 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip + stent | 4 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 65 | 17 mo |
| Luigiano et al[56] | Fistula (1) | 25 | > 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 5 | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 1 mo |
| Endoloop | 1 | |||||||||
| Ivekovic et al[55] | Perforation (1) | 15 × 10 | ≤ 24 | Im/Tm | Endoloop | 1 | 1/1 (100%) | ND | ND | 4 wk |
| Endoclip | 4 | |||||||||
| Jung et al[63] | Perforation (1) | 25 | > 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | 12 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | ND | 2 mo |
| Endoloop | 1 | |||||||||
| Rokszin et al[47] | Perforation (1) | 5-7 | < 24 | Tp | Endoclip | 3 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 14 | 6 mo |
| Coda et al[64] | Perforation (1) | 20 (distal) | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | 6 | 1/1 (100%) | Yes | 15 | 6 mo |
| Sato et al[24] | Perforation (1) | ND | < 24 | Im/Tm | Endoclip | ND | 1/1 (100%) | No | ND | ND |
| Biancari et al[65] | Perforation (4) | 8 (median) | < 24 | Tm | Endoclip | ND | 3/4 (75%) | Yes | 32 (median) | No |
| Huang et al[66] | Perforation (4) | ND | < 24 | ND | Endoclip | 2 | 4/4 (100%) | ND | ND | ND |
Table 2 Published literature reporting over-the-scope clip closure of oesophageal perforations
| Ref. | Cause | Size/mm | Time to treatment (< 24 h <) | Im/Tm/Tp | Method | Nr | Clinical success | Additional treatment | Hospital stay /d | Follow-up |
| Pohl et al[67] | Leak (1) | < 0 | > 24 | Tp | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | No | 30 | ND |
| Perforation (1) | ND | > 24 | Tp | Surgery + stent + OTSC | 0/1(0%) | Yes | Died | ND | ||
| von Renteln et al[68] | Fistula (2) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 0/2(0%) | ND | ND | ND |
| ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | Yes | ND | ND | |||
| Traina et al[69] | Fistula (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | 4 wk |
| Albert et al[70] | Fistula (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | 46 wk |
| Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 0/1(0%) | Stent | ND | 4 wk | |
| Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | 63 wk | |
| Kirschniak et al[71] | Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 1/1(100%) | ND | 10 | ND |
| Manta et al[72] | Fistula (1) | 8 × 4 | > 24 | Tm | OTSC + standard clips | 1+3 | 1/1(100%) | No | 0 | ND |
| Surace et al[73] | Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | ND |
| Baron et al[41] | Leak (3) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 4 | 1/3(33%) | ND | ND | 77 avg. (30-330 d) |
| Perforation (1) | ND | < 24 | Tm | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | ||||
| Hadj Amor et al[74] | Perforation (1) | 20 | < 24 | Tp | OTSC + stent | 1 | 1/1(100%) | VATS | ND | ND |
| Hagel et al[53] | Leak (2) | 28 × 13 | > 24 | Tm/Tp | OTSC | 3 | 1/2(50%) | Surgery | Died | 30 d |
| 8 × 4 | No | 12.3 ± 11 | 30 d | |||||||
| Perforation (2) | 8 × 3 | > 24 | Tm/Tp | OTSC | 1 | 0/2(0%) | Surgery | 30 d | ||
| 14 × 3 | > 24 | Surgery | 30 d | |||||||
| Jacobsen et al[75] | Perforation (3) | 9 | > 24 | ND | OTSC | 2 | 3/3(100%) | No | ND | ND |
| 10 (distal) | > 24 | ND | 1 | No | ND | ND | ||||
| 10 | > 24 | ND | 2 | No | ND | ND | ||||
| Markar et al[76] | Leak (1) | ND | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 2 | 1/1(100%) | Yes | ND | 3 mo |
| Voermans et al[40] | Perforation (5) | < 30 | < 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 5/5(100%) | No | ND | 6 mo |
| Zolotarevsky et al[77] | Fistula (1) | 5 | > 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 1/1(100%) | ND | 7 | 3 mo |
| Braun et al[43] | Perforation (6) | 10-40 | < 24 | Tm/Tp | OTSC | 1-4 | 6/6(100%) | VATS | 9-19 | 6-12 wk |
| Ferreira et al[51] | Perforation (1) | 10 (distal) | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | No | 21 | 3 mo |
| Noronha Ferreira et al[78] | Leak (1) | 10 × 6 | > 24 | Tm | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | No | 14 | ND |
| Nishiyama et al[79] | Perforation (1) | 20 | > 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 1/1(100%) | ND | ND | 56 d |
| Ramhamadany et al[49] | Perforation (1) | ND | > 24 | ND | OTSC | ND | 1/1(100%) | Yes | ND | 6 mo |
| Bona et al[48] | Perforation (1) | 10 | > 24 | Tm/Tp | OTSC | 1 | 1/1(100%) | No | 28 | No |
| Haito-Chavez et al[42] | Perforation (10) | ND | < 24 | Tm/Tp | OTSC | 10/10(100%) | ND | ND | Median follow-up: 121-207 d | |
| Leaks (5) | ND | > 24 | Tm/Tp | 4/5(80%) | ND | ND | ||||
| Fistula (16) | ND | > 24 | Tm/Tp | 9/16(57%) | ND | ND | ||||
| Mönkemüller et al[52] | Fistula (4) | 10-15 | > 24 | ND | OTSC | 1-2 | 2/4(50%) | No | ND | 10 mo (1-10) |
| Leak (1) | 10-12 | > 24 | ND | OTSC | 0/1(0%) | No | ND |
- Citation: Lázár G, Paszt A, Mán E. Role of endoscopic clipping in the treatment of oesophageal perforations. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(1): 13-22
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i1/13.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.13