Magalhães J, Rosa B, Cotter J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: From guidelines to clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(2): 128-134 [PMID: 25685269 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.128]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Joana Magalhães, MD, Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave, Rua dos Cutileiros, Creixomil, 4835-044 Guimarães, Portugal. jmagalhaes@chaa.min-saude.pt
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2015; 7(2): 128-134 Published online Feb 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.128
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population n (%)
Variable
Total (n= 268)
Gender, female
161 (60.1)
Age, mean ± SD
66.8 ± 16.8
Very strong predictors
Clinical ascending cholangitis
36 (13.4)
Common bile duct stone on US
109 (40.7)
Total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL
102 (38.1)
Strong predictors
Total bilirubin 1.8-4 mg/dL
84 (31.3)
Dilated common bile duct on US
195 (72.8)
Moderate predictors
Abnormal liver function test
231 (86.2)
Age > 55 yr
197 (73.5)
Gallstone pancreatitis
63 (23.5)
Table 2 Predictors of choledocholithiasis - univariate analysis n (%)
Variable
Choledocholithiasis on ERCP
No Choledocholithiasis on ERCP
OR
95%CI
Pvalue
Very strong predictors
Clinical ascending cholangitis
33 (91.7)
3 (8.3)
6.48
1.93-21.80
0.001
Common bile duct stone on US
100 (91.7)
9 (8.3)
11.25
5.32-23.81
< 0.001
Total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL
76 (74.5)
26 (25.5)
1.79
1.04-3.08
0.035
Strong predictors
Total bilirubin 1.8-4 mg/dL
63 (75.0)
21 (25.0)
3.15
1.63-6.08
0.001
Dilated common bile duct on US
150 (76.9)
45 (23.1)
5.06
2.85-8.99
< 0.001
Moderate predictors
Abnormal liver function test
161 (69.7)
70 (30.3)
2.43
1.20-4.90
0.012
Age > 55 yr
142 (72.1)
55 (27.9)
2.37
1.36-4.15
0.002
Gallstone pancreatitis
36 (57.2)
27 (42.8)
0.58
0.32-1.03
0.063
Table 3 Risk group for choledocholithiasis - univariate analysis n (%)
Variable
Total
Choledocholithiasis on ERCP
No Choledocholithiasis on ERCP
Pvalue
High risk group
193 (72.0)
154 (79.8)
39 (20.2)
< 0.001
Intermediate risk group
73 (27.2)
25 (34.2)
48 (65.8)
Low risk group
2 (0.8)
0 (0)
2 (100)
Very strong predictors
None
97 (36.2)
39 (40.2)
58 (59.8)
< 0.001
One
104 (38.8)
80 (76.9)
24 (23.1)
Two
58 (21.6)
51 (87.9)
7 (12.1)
Three
9 (3.4)
9 (100)
0 (0)
Strong predictors
None
27 (16.4)
3 (11.1)
24 (88.9)
< 0.001
One
78 (47.3)
50 (64.1)
28 (35.9)
Two
60 (36.4)
50 (83.3)
10 (16.7)
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values for choledocolithiasis
Variable
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
Very strong predictors
Clinical ascending cholangitis
18.4
96.6
91.7
37.0
Common bile duct stone on US
55.9
89.9
91.7
50.3
Total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL
42.5
70.8
74.5
37.8
Strong predictors
Total bilirubin 1.8-4 mg/dL
61.1
66.6
75
51.2
Dilated common bile duct on US
83.8
49.4
76.9
60.3
Moderate predictors
Abnormal liver function test
89.9
21.3
69.7
51.3
Age > 55 yr
79.3
38.2
72.1
47.9
Gallstone pancreatitis
20.1
69.7
57.1
30.2
High risk group
86
56.2
79.8
66.7
Intermediate risk group
13.9
46
34,2
21
Citation: Magalhães J, Rosa B, Cotter J. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: From guidelines to clinical practice. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(2): 128-134