Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2013; 5(9): 420-427
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420
Table 1 Per-oral endoscopic myotomy equipment
| High-definition diagnostic gastroscope |
| Transparent 4 mm distal cap attachment |
| Electrosurgical device for injection of saline, incision and cautery ( T-type HK hybrid knife- with Erbe jet pump) |
| Electrosurgical device for incision and cautery (Triangle tip knife) and injection of saline with Injector force Max 4 mm, 23-gauge injection needle |
| Electrosurgical high frequency generator (e.g., ERBE VIO 300D) |
| Coagulation 5 mm grasper (Olympus) |
| Endoscopic clips (Boston-Scientific, Olympus, Wilson-Cook) |
| Needle or trocar for potential decompression of capnoperitoneum (angiocatheter, Veress needle 120 mm) |
| Endoscopic dilating balloons- CRE balloon dilator (5.5 cm, 10-11-12 mm) multiple manufacturers (rarely required) |
| Submucosal injection: Methylene blue or indigo carmine diluted in saline |
Table 2 Evolution of per-oral endoscopic myotomy: A single center experience
| Initial | Subsequent | Rationale |
| Performed in operating room with surgeon present | Performed in endoscopy suite with surgeon available | Demonstrated to be a predictable and safe procedure. Moderate procedural time |
| Selected patients had no prior achalasia intervention | Selected patients include those with prior intervention (BTI, PD, HM) | POEM results here and elsewhere |
| Use of dilation balloons to dissect submucosal tunnel | No or little use of balloon. Evolution from needle knife to IT knife and now hybrid knife | Experience. More reliable dissection with knives. Hybrid knife with flushing capability |
| Variable orientation of initial incision site | Preference for 5 o’clock position | Improved dysphagia relief |
| Short myotomy-less than 6 cm | Myotomy tailored to manometry findings and components of Eckardt score | POEM results here and elsewhere |
| Partial LES myotomy of circular muscle only | Preference for complete myotomy unless low LESP on manometry | Concern for POEM efficacy. Post-POEM GERD usually manageable with medication |
Table 3 Per-oral endoscopic myotomy experience: Series data
| No. of patients |
| No. of completed POEMs |
| Age (mean, yr) |
| Achalasia by HRM subtype |
| I |
| II |
| III |
| Esophageal dilation > 6 cm or sigmoid |
| Percent of patients who failed prior conventional achalasia treatment (Endoscopic balloon dilation, Botulinum toxin injection, Heller myotomy) |
| Pre/Post eckardt score (mean) |
| Percent of patients with clinical success at 3 mo (Eckardt score £ 3) |
| Myotomy length (mean, centimeter) |
| Percent of technical errors |
| Minor mucosal perforations requiring clip closure |
| Needle decompression of capnoperitoneum |
| Percent of adverse events |
| Surgical intervention/conversion |
| ICU or step down unit stay |
| Prolonged hospital stay > 5 d |
| Significant blood loss or blood transfusion |
| POEM related readmission |
- Citation: Friedel D, Modayil R, Iqbal S, Grendell JH, Stavropoulos SN. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: An American perspective. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(9): 420-427
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i9/420.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420
