Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2013; 5(7): 346-351
Published online Jul 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.346
Published online Jul 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.346
Table 1 Profiles of six endoscopes and outcomes for transnasal insertion
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
EFI (mm) | 224 | 192.4 | 175.2 | 174.8 | 146 | 166.6 |
Tip diameter (mm) | 5 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 5.4 |
Transnasal insertion | ||||||
Insertion success rate | 58/59 | 110/112 | 119/123 | 112/118 | 47/47 | 57/57 |
Nasal bleeding rate | 0/58 | 2/110 | 2/119 | 2/112 | 1/47 | 0/57 |
VAS | 4.2 ± 2.7 | 4.0 ± 2.1 | 4.0 ± 2.4 | 4.0 ± 2.3 | 3.2 ± 2.2 | 3.8 ± 2.3 |
Examination time (s) | 351.0 ± 58.8 | 345.8 ± 62.2 | 324.9 ± 61.1 | 340.0 ± 48.1 | 376.7 ± 61.7 | 349.1 ± 57.3 |
Table 2 Characteristics of patients
Transnasal insertion(n = 503) | Transoral insertion(n = 235) | P value | |
Gender M/F | 299/204 | 118/117 | < 0.05 |
Age (yr) | 56.8 ± 11.2 (25-84) | 61.3 ± 13.0 (27-88) | < 0.05 |
1st examination Y/N | 54/449 | 19/216 | 0.29 |
Operator A/B | 326/177 | 143/92 | 0.32 |
Endoscope | 0.36 | ||
A | 58 | 31 | |
B | 110 | 52 | |
C | 119 | 58 | |
D | 112 | 61 | |
E | 47 | 17 | |
F | 57 | 16 | |
Examination time (s) | 343.4 ± 59.4 (210-630) | 324.5 ± 59.8 (196-600) | < 0.05 |
VAS | 3.9 ± 2.3 (0-10) | 4.1 ± 2.5 (0-10) | 0.90 |
Table 3 Multivariate analysis for visual analog scale in transnasal insertion
Parameter estimate ± SE | P value | |
Gender (F) | 0.780 ± 0.100 | < 0.05 |
Age | -0.0193 ± 0.00886 | < 0.05 |
1st examination (N) | 0.252 ± 0.160 | 0.12 |
Operator (A) | -0.341 ± 0.110 | < 0.05 |
Scope (E) | -0.719 ± 0.281 | < 0.05 |
Examination time | 0.00270 ± 0.00180 | 0.134 |
Table 4 Results of multivariate analysis of visual analog scale scores for transoral insertion
Parameter estimate ± SE | P value | |
Gender (F) | 0.575 ± 0.156 | < 0.05 |
Age | -0.0343 ± 0.0125 | < 0.05 |
1st examination (N) | -0.00289 ± 0.294 | 0.99 |
Operator (A) | -0.297 ± 0.177 | 0.10 |
Scope (C) | 0.634 ± 0.313 | < 0.05 |
Examination time | -0.00159 ± 0.00291 | 0.59 |
Table 5 Parameters of endoscopic flexibility index and tip diameter by multivariate analysis for visual analog scale
Transnasal insertion | Transoral insertion | |
EFI | 0.0125 ± 0.00563 (P < 0.05) | 0.0212 ± 0.00966 (P < 0.05) |
Tip diameter | 0.450 ± 0.338 (P = 0.18) | 1.33 ± 0.561 (P < 0.05) |
- Citation: Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Nakao T, Suzuki K, Ohike Y, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(7): 346-351
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i7/346.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.346