Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Nakao T, Suzuki K, Ohike Y, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(7): 346-351 [PMID: 23858379 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.346]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Satoshi Ono, MD, PhD, Center for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. satoshi-tky@umin.ac.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2013; 5(7): 346-351 Published online Jul 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i7.346
Table 1 Profiles of six endoscopes and outcomes for transnasal insertion
A
B
C
D
E
F
EFI (mm)
224
192.4
175.2
174.8
146
166.6
Tip diameter (mm)
5
5.4
5.9
5.9
5.2
5.4
Transnasal insertion
Insertion success rate
58/59
110/112
119/123
112/118
47/47
57/57
Nasal bleeding rate
0/58
2/110
2/119
2/112
1/47
0/57
VAS
4.2 ± 2.7
4.0 ± 2.1
4.0 ± 2.4
4.0 ± 2.3
3.2 ± 2.2
3.8 ± 2.3
Examination time (s)
351.0 ± 58.8
345.8 ± 62.2
324.9 ± 61.1
340.0 ± 48.1
376.7 ± 61.7
349.1 ± 57.3
Table 2 Characteristics of patients
Transnasal insertion(n = 503)
Transoral insertion(n = 235)
P value
Gender M/F
299/204
118/117
< 0.05
Age (yr)
56.8 ± 11.2 (25-84)
61.3 ± 13.0 (27-88)
< 0.05
1st examination Y/N
54/449
19/216
0.29
Operator A/B
326/177
143/92
0.32
Endoscope
0.36
A
58
31
B
110
52
C
119
58
D
112
61
E
47
17
F
57
16
Examination time (s)
343.4 ± 59.4 (210-630)
324.5 ± 59.8 (196-600)
< 0.05
VAS
3.9 ± 2.3 (0-10)
4.1 ± 2.5 (0-10)
0.90
Table 3 Multivariate analysis for visual analog scale in transnasal insertion
Parameter estimate ± SE
P value
Gender (F)
0.780 ± 0.100
< 0.05
Age
-0.0193 ± 0.00886
< 0.05
1st examination (N)
0.252 ± 0.160
0.12
Operator (A)
-0.341 ± 0.110
< 0.05
Scope (E)
-0.719 ± 0.281
< 0.05
Examination time
0.00270 ± 0.00180
0.134
Table 4 Results of multivariate analysis of visual analog scale scores for transoral insertion
Parameter estimate ± SE
P value
Gender (F)
0.575 ± 0.156
< 0.05
Age
-0.0343 ± 0.0125
< 0.05
1st examination (N)
-0.00289 ± 0.294
0.99
Operator (A)
-0.297 ± 0.177
0.10
Scope (C)
0.634 ± 0.313
< 0.05
Examination time
-0.00159 ± 0.00291
0.59
Table 5 Parameters of endoscopic flexibility index and tip diameter by multivariate analysis for visual analog scale
Transnasal insertion
Transoral insertion
EFI
0.0125 ± 0.00563 (P < 0.05)
0.0212 ± 0.00966 (P < 0.05)
Tip diameter
0.450 ± 0.338 (P = 0.18)
1.33 ± 0.561 (P < 0.05)
Citation: Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Nakao T, Suzuki K, Ohike Y, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Ultrathin endoscope flexibility can predict discomfort associated with unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(7): 346-351