Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2013; 5(12): 595-599
Published online Dec 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i12.595
Published online Dec 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i12.595
Table 1 Control group vs real time viewer group: Baseline characteristics and outcomes n (%)
| Control group | RTV group | P-values | |
| (n = 307) | (n = 82) | ||
| Age (mean ± SD), yr | 49.7 ± 20.7 | 48 ± 20.5 | 0.5181 |
| Gender (male/female) | (136/171) | (32/50) | 0.4522 |
| History of abdominal surgery | 24 (8) | 12 (15) | 0.0832 |
| Inpatient status | 38 (12.3) | 10 (12.2) | 1.002 |
| Clinical indication | 0.0793 | ||
| OGIB-occult | 117 (38) | 26 (32) | |
| OGIB-overt | 46 (15) | 6 (7) | |
| Suspected CD | 83 (27) | 29 (35) | |
| CD staging | 33 (11) | 11 (14) | |
| Other indications | 28 (9) | 10 (12) | |
| Incomplete examination | 48 (15,6) | 3 (3,7) | 0.0032 |
| Positive findings | 120 (39) | 40 (49) | 0.0813 |
- Citation: Cotter J, Castro FD, Magalhães J, Moreira MJ, Rosa B. Finding the solution for incomplete small bowel capsule endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(12): 595-599
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i12/595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i12.595
