Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2011; 3(5): 95-100
Published online May 16, 2011. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i5.95
Published online May 16, 2011. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i5.95
Table 1 Patient demographic characteristics and portal hypertension etiology n (%)
| Ligationn = 50 | Sclerotherapyn = 50 | ||
| Mean age (years) | 54.48 | 50.24 | P1 = 0.47 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 37 (74.0) | 35 (70.0 ) | P2 = 0.58 |
| Female | 13 (26.0) | 15 (30.0 ) | |
| Etiology | |||
| Alcohol | 19 (38.0) | 17 (34.0) | P2 = 0.83 |
| Virus | 19 (38.0) | 15 (30.0) | P2 = 0.53 |
| Schistosomiasisa | 6 (12.0) | 11 (22.0) | P2 = 0.29 |
| Secondary biliary cirrhosis | 4 (8.0) | 3 (6.0) | P2 = 0.99 |
| Cryptogenic cirrhosis | 1 (2.0) | 2 (4.0) | P2 = 0.99 |
| Primary biliary cirrhosis | 1(2.0) | 2 (4.0) | P2 = 0.99 |
| Child-Pugh Classification | |||
| Child A | 2 ( 4.0) | 3 (6.0) | |
| Child B | 22 (44.0) | 21 (42.0) | P1 =0.69 |
| Child C | 20 (40.0) | 15 (30.0) |
Table 2 Clinical and endoscopic findings at index bleeding n (%)
| Band Ligation (n=50) | Sclerotherapy (n =50) | ||
| Size of Varices | |||
| Small | 10 | 13 | |
| Medium | 5 | 7 | |
| Large | 5 | 4 | |
| Small/Medium | 17 | 17 | |
| Small/Large | 2 | 2 | |
| Medium/Large | 11 | 7 | |
| Digestive hemorrhage intensity | |||
| Mild | 15 (30) | 17 (34) | |
| Moderate | 20 (40) | 19 (38) | P = 0.32 |
| Severe | 15 (30) | 14 (28) | |
| Hemoglobin at admission | |||
| mean ± SD | 9.52 ± 3.25 | 9.47 ± 2.55 | P = 0.96 |
| Red spots | |||
| Presence | 46(92.8) | 43(86.8) | P = 0.64 |
| Absence | 4 (8.8) | 7 (14.8) | |
| Endoscopic criteria for variceal bleeding | |||
| Active bleeding | 5 (10) | 10 (20) | |
| Platelet-fibrin plug | 35 (70) | 34 (68) | P = 0.43 |
| Varices and gastric blood | 10 (20) | 6 (12) |
Table 3 Occurrences of re-bleeding, success and mortality up to 5 d n (%)
| Group | Re-bleeding | Success | Mortality |
| Sclerotherapy (n = 50) | 7 (14.0) | 43 (86.0) | 3 (6.0) |
| Band Ligation (n = 50) | 11 (22.0) | 39 (78.0) | 6 (12.0) |
Table 4 Occurrences of re-bleeding, success and mortality up to 5 d, excluding patients with schistosomiasis n (%)
| Group | Success | Re-bleeding | Mortality |
| Sclerotherapy (n = 39) | 33 (84.6) | 6 (15.4) | 3 (7.7) |
| Band Ligation (n = 44) | 33 (75.0) | 11 (25.0) | 6 (13.6) |
| P = 0.41 | P = 0.49 |
Table 5 Occurrences of re-bleeding, success and mortality from 5 d to 6 wk n (%)
| Group | Re-bleeding | Success | Mortality |
| Sclerotherapy (n = 42) | 2 (4.8) | 36 (86.0) | 6 (14.0) |
| Band Ligation (n = 37) | 1 (2.7) | 33 (89.0) | 4 (11.0) |
Table 6 Mortality rate through 6 wk n (%)
| Group | Deaths through 6 wk | |||
| Mortalityup to 5 d | Mortality after 5 d | Total Mortality | Success | |
| Sclerotherapy (n = 45) | 3 (7.0) | 6 (13.0) | 9 (20.0) | 36 (80.0) |
| Band Ligation (n = 43) | 6 (14.0) | 4 (9.0) | 10 (23.0) | 33 (77.0) |
| P = 0.40 | ||||
- Citation: Luz GO, Maluf-Filho F, Matuguma SE, Hondo FY, Ide E, Melo JM, Cheng S, Sakai P. Comparison between endoscopic sclerotherapy and band ligation for hemostasis of acute variceal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3(5): 95-100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v3/i5/95.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v3.i5.95
