Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2011; 3(3): 57-61
Published online Mar 16, 2011. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i3.57
Published online Mar 16, 2011. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i3.57
American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification | ||||
I | II | III | IV | |
Group I | 3 | 19 | 15 | 2 |
Group II | 4 | 17 | 23 | 2 |
Group I | Group II | P | ||
Sphincterotomy | Yes | 17 | 22 | 0.69 |
No | 22 | 24 | ||
Common bile duct stone extraction | Yes | 9 | 5 | 0.13 |
No | 30 | 41 | ||
Biliary plastic stent | Yes | 14 | 24 | 0.18 |
No | 25 | 22 | ||
Biliary metallic stent | Yes | 6 | 3 | 0.29 |
No | 33 | 43 | ||
Pancreatic plastic stent | Yes | 0 | 3 | 0.24 |
No | 39 | 43 | ||
Endoscopic therapy | Not necessary | 8 | 1 | 0.006 |
Necessary | 31 | 45 |
- Citation: Vila JJ, Kutz M, Goñi S, Ostiz M, Amorena E, Prieto C, Rodriguez C, Fernández-Urien I, Jiménez FJ. Endoscopic and anesthetic feasibility of EUS and ERCP combined in a single session versus two different sessions. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3(3): 57-61
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v3/i3/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v3.i3.57