Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 106936
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.106936
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.106936
Table 1 Results of included studies, n (%)
Ref. | Number of patients | Technical success | Procedure-related AEs | Severe AEs1 | Type of AEs | Follow-up data on long-term patency |
Kawakami et al[2], 2014 | 22 | 22 (100) | 2 (9.1) | 0 | Mild hemobilia, mild post-ERCP pancreatitis | No |
Puri et al[3], 2018 | 25 | 25 (100) | 15 (60) | 0 | Mild upper abdominal discomfort | No |
Sundaram et al[4], 2021 | 10 | 10 (100) | 2 (20) | 0 | Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis, self-limiting bleeding | No |
Kato et al[5], 2019 | 13 | 13 (100) | 2 (15.4) | 0 | Mild hemobilia, cholangitis | 1115 days, 61.5% |
- Citation: Ksissa O, Dioscoridi L, Forti E, Pugliese F, Cintolo M, Palermo A, Mutignani M. Does wire-guided cystotome dilation for difficult benign bilio-pancreatic strictures guarantee long-term patency? A narrative mini-review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(9): 106936
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i9/106936.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.106936