Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2025; 17(8): 110335
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.110335
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.110335
Table 1 comparative overview of bariatric procedures: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs intragastric balloon vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Procedure | Mean total weight loss at 12 months | Serious adverse event rate | Reversibility | Key advantages |
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty | 15%–18% | < 5% | Yes | Minimally invasive, reversible, low complication rate, no anatomical alteration |
Intragastric balloon | 8%–12% | < 5% | Yes | Temporary, low cost, non-anatomical |
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy | 25%–30% | 5%–10% | No | Greater weight loss, long-term evidence base |
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass | 30%–35% | 7%–15% | No | High metabolic efficacy, significant comorbidity resolution (e.g., type 2 diabetes mellitus remission) |
- Citation: Shan YZ, Qin Y, Liu HY, Zhou YH, Cao Q, Jiao Y. Minimally invasive approaches to obesity: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastroplasty. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(8): 110335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i8/110335.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.110335