Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 16, 2025; 17(8): 107867
Published online Aug 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.107867
Table 1 Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients in the entire cohort and by age groups, n (%)
Factor
Entire cohort (n = 227)
Age (years)
P value
< 65 (n = 117)
65-75 (n = 57)
> 75 (n = 53)
Age (years), mean ± SD61.9 ± 16.749.4 ± 13.169.5 ± 3.181.3 ± 3.8-
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD28.0 ± 6.328.4 ± 6.228.2 ± 7.226.9 ± 5.30.33
Gender0.86
Female130 (57.27)69 (58.97)32 (56.14)29 (54.72)
Male97 (42.73)48 (41.03)25 (43.86)24 (45.28)
Ethnicity0.14
Non-Hispanic128 (56.64)73 (62.93)29 (50.88)26 (49.06)
Hispanic98 (43.36)43 (37.07)28 (49.12)27 (50.94)
Indication of enteroscopy
GI bleeding109 (48.02)50 (42.74)23 (40.35)36 (67.92)0.004
Abdominal pain32 (14.10)28 (23.93)2 (3.51)2 (3.77)< 0.001
Iron deficiency anemia109 (48.02)52 (44.44)32 (56.14)25 (47.17)0.35
Others1110 (48.46)57 (48.72)32 (56.14)21 (39.62)0.22
Number of indications0.74
199 (43.61)52 (44.44)25 (43.86)22 (41.51)
288 (38.77)42 (35.90)25 (43.86)21 (39.62)
≥ 340 (17.62)23 (19.66)7 (12.28)10 (18.87)
Prior video capsule160 (70.80)78 (67.24)44 (77.19)38 (71.70)0.39
Route0.22
Antegrade194 (85.46)104 (88.89)45 (78.95)45 (84.91)
Retrograde33 (14.54)13 (11.11)12 (21.05)8 (15.09)
Bypass-yes19 (8.37)13 (11.11)4 (7.02)2 (3.77)0.29
Table 2 Differences in the outcomes between age groups among single-balloon enteroscopy patients
FactorEntire cohort (n = 227)Age (years)
P value
< 65 (n = 117)
65-75 (n = 57)
> 75 (n = 53)
Diagnostic findings1< 0.001
Normal98 (45.79)57 (51.82)25 (46.30)16 (32.00)
Angioectasia45 (21.03)12 (10.91)11 (20.37)22 (44.00)
Erosion/ulcer23 (10.75)14 (12.73)7 (12.96)2 (4.00)
Other248 (22.43)27 (24.55)11 (20.37)10 (20.00)
Diagnostic yield116 (54.21)53 (48.18)29 (53.70)34 (68.00)0.066a
Intervention91 (40.09)41 (35.04)19 (33.33)31 (58.49)0.007b
Therapeutic yield56 (24.67)17 (14.53)12 (21.05)27 (50.94)< 0.001b
Complications2 (0.88)1 (0.85)0 (0.00)1 (1.89)0.57
Table 3 Adjusted differences in the outcomes by age groups
CharacteristicsAge (years)
< 6565-75
> 75
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Diagnostic findings
Normal (reference) ReferenceReference-Reference-
AngioectasiaReference2.25 (0.85-5.95)0.1027.16 (2.79-18.38)< 0.001
Erosion/ulcerReference1.1 (0.38-3.19)0.8560.43 (0.09-2.2)0.313
Other1Reference1.04 (0.43-2.52)0.9221.33 (0.5-3.54)0.575
Diagnostic yieldReference1.37 (0.69-2.7)0.3652.38 (1.14-4.96)0.021
InterventionReference1.13 (0.56-2.28)0.7423.15 (1.54-6.47)0.002
Depth of the scope, RC (95%CI)Reference-19.02 (-39.57 to 1.52)0.06916.29 (-4.82 to 37.41)0.130
Table 4 Differences in the outcomes between age groups among single-balloon enteroscopy patients by type of single-balloon enteroscopy
Factor
Entire cohort (n = 194)
Age (years)
P value
< 65 (n = 104)
65-75 (n = 45)
> 75 (n = 45)
Depth of the scope, mean ± SD, n = 178227.1 (59.1)227.3 (60.4)211.9 (54.2)242.1 (58.2)0.060
Diagnostic findings1< 0.001
Normal84 (44.92)51 (51.52)21 (46.67)12 (27.91)
Angioectasia44 (23.53)12 (12.12)11 (24.44)21 (48.84)
Erosion/ulcer18 (9.63)13 (13.13)4 (8.89)1 (2.33)
Other41 (21.93)23 (23.23)9 (20.00)9 (20.93)
Diagnostic yield103 (55.08)48 (48.48)24 (53.33)31 (72.09)0.033
Intervention83 (42.78)39 (37.50)17 (37.78)27 (60.00)0.029
Therapeutic yield51 (26.29)17 (16.35)11 (24.44)23 (51.11)< 0.001
Complications2 (1.03)1 (0.96)0 (0.00)1 (2.22)0.58
Retrograde3313128-
Depth of the scope, mean ± SD, n = 30106.9 (82.1)117.1 (82.7)73.1 (63.2)133.8 (97.2)0.26
Diagnostic findings10.48
Normal14 (51.85)6 (54.55)4 (44.44)4 (57.14)
Angioectasia1 (3.70)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)1 (14.29)
Erosion/ulcer5 (18.52)1 (9.09)3 (33.33)1 (14.29)
Other7 (25.93)4 (36.36)2 (22.22)1 (14.29)
Diagnostic yield13 (48.15)5 (45.45)5 (55.56)3 (42.86)0.86
Intervention8 (24.24)2 (15.38)2 (16.67)4 (50.00)0.15
Therapeutic yield5 (15.15)0 (0.00)1 (8.33)4 (50.00)0.006
Complications0000-
Table 5 Adjusted differences in the outcomes by age groups by type of single-balloon enteroscopy after removing gastric bypass
Factor
< 65 years
65-75 years
> 75 years
Reference
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Diagnostic findings
NormalReferenceReference-Reference-
AngioectasiaReference1.97 (0.69-5.6)0.2027.7 (2.81-21.14)< 0.001
Erosion/ulcer/otherReference0.93 (0.37-2.32)0.8711.13 (0.40-3.23)0.815
Diagnostic yieldReference1.25 (0.57-2.73)0.5843.02 (1.32-6.93)0.009
InterventionReference1.10 (0.50-2.45)0.8082.69 (1.23-5.9)0.013
Depth of the scope-RC (95%CI)Reference-11.26 (-33.15 to 10.63)0.31113.52 (-8.57 to 35.62)0.229
Retrograde
Diagnostic findings
NormalReferenceReference-Reference-
Erosion/ulcer/otherReference3.25 (0.35-30.05)0.2991.29 (0.11-15.32)0.84
Diagnostic yieldReference3.75 (0.4-34.8)0.2451.73 (0.18-16.82)0.639
InterventionReference2.07 (0.13-33.57)0.60811.97 (0.76-187.64)0.077
Depth of the scope-RC (95%CI)Reference-16.47 (-88.39 to 55.45)0.63931.19 (-45.01 to 107.39)0.404
Table 6 Studies of single-balloon enteroscopy in the elderly
Ref.
Country
Time period
No. Pts.
Age groups, years
Main indication
Main findings
Davis-Yadley et al[33], 2016FL, United States2010-2014366< 55, 55-64OGIBDY highest in elderly
65-74, ≥ 75Angiodysplasia most common in elderly
TY higher in elderly
Safe, few complications
Lin et al[34], 2016Taiwan2009-2014128< 30, 30-65OGIBThe most common finding in the older age group was angiodysplasia
> 65
Chang et al[35], 2017Taiwan2009-2016168< 65, ≥ 65OGIBDY high in the elderly
Angiodysplasia and diverticulum TY high in the elderly
Safe, no diff in complications
This studyTX, United States2011-2020228< 65, 65-75OGIBDY higher in the elderly
> 75IDAMain finding was angioectasias
TY higher in the very elderly, safe