Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 108293
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108293
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108293
Table 1 The summary table of the application progress of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal diseases
Disease type | Application scenario | Research progress | Key indicators | Notes |
BE | Assisted diagnosis, targeted biopsies | Convolutional Neural Network for detecting dysplasia in BE: Sensitivity 91%, specificity 79%, AUC value 93%[6] | Sensitivity: 91%-93.8%; specificity: 79%-90.7%; accuracy: 92.0% | AI significantly improves the detection rate of BE, reducing missed and misdiagnosed cases |
AI model for automatic identification and segmentation of BE extent: IoU values 0.56 and 0.82[7] | ||||
Multicenter real-time endoscopic video detection: Sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 90.7%, accuracy 92.0%[9] | ||||
Esophageal cancer | Early lesion detection | CAD system for detecting squamous cell carcinoma: Accuracy 92.9%, comparable to experts[12] | Sensitivity: 93.8%; specificity: 91.73%; accuracy: 92.9%-94% | AI shows excellent performance in early esophageal cancer detection |
DL models: Accuracy 92.9%-94% in NBI mode, 92.9% in white-light mode[13] | ||||
AI-assisted system improves detection rates and reduces missed diagnoses[15] | ||||
GERD | Disease classification, lesion segmentation | DL model for LA grading: Accuracy 87.9%-95.7%[19,22] | Accuracy: 87.9%-95.7%; IoU value: 0.9007 | AI performs well in GERD grading and lesion segmentation |
XAI model for five-class classification: Accuracy 86.7%, higher than senior endoscopists[23] | ||||
Attention U-Net segmentation model: IoU value 09007[24] | ||||
Esophagogastric varices | Real-time diagnosis, bleeding risk prediction | AI system for detecting esophagogastric varices: Accuracy 93.8%, comparable to endoscopists[33] | Accuracy: 93.8%; sensitivity: 80% (bleeding risk prediction); specificity: 74.4% | AI outperforms traditional methods in variceal diagnosis and risk prediction |
DL model based on CT imaging for predicting variceal bleeding risk[34] |
- Citation: Li XR, Kong MW, Guan XF, Gao Y. Revolutionizing upper gastrointestinal disease diagnosis: The transformative role of artificial intelligence in endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 108293
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i7/108293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108293