Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2024; 16(9): 502-508
Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i9.502
Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i9.502
Table 1 Risk factors for poor prognosis
| Low risk | High risk |
| Well or moderately differentiated (G1-2) | Poorly differentiated (G3) |
| Free resection margins | Affected resection margins |
| Absence of lymphovascular invasion | Presence of lymphovascular invasion |
| Absent or low grade budding (Bd0-I) | Intermediate or high budding (Bd2-3) |
| - | Mucinous, micropapillary or signet ring type |
| Absence of Poorly differentiated clusters | Presence of Poorly differentiated clusters |
| MMI (muscularis mucosae intact) | MM2 (fragmented muscularis mucosae) |
| Submucosal invasion < 1000 µm | Submucosal invasion > 1000 µm |
- Citation: Mateos Sanchez C, Quintanilla Lazaro E, Rabago LR. How secure can we expect the surveillance policies to be after the implementation in T1 polyps with carcinoma? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(9): 502-508
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i9/502.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i9.502
