Lin XM, Peng YM, Zeng HT, Yang JX, Xu ZL. Endoscopic “calabash” ligation and resection for small gastric mesenchymal tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(10): 545-556 [PMID: 39473541 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zheng-Lei Xu, MD, Assistant Professor, Chief Doctor, Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, No. 1017 Dongmen North Road, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong Province, China. 78249073@qq.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Comparison of treatment results and complications between the two groups, n (%)
Control group (n = 260)
Study group (n = 260)
P value
Endoscopic treatment outcomes
Complete resection (cases)
260
260
> 0.999
Incomplete resection (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Intraoperative complications
Intraoperative bleeding (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Intraoperative perforation (cases)
28 (3.08)
3 (1.15)
< 0.001
Intraoperative endoscopic examination failure and conversion to open surgery (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Postoperative complications
Postoperative abdominal pain score (points)
0.25 ± 0.56
0.16 ± 0.43
0.029
Postoperative delayed bleeding (cases)
1 (0.38)
0 (0)
> 0.999
Average volume of red blood cell suspension transfused (U)
2
0
0.318
Postoperative delayed perforation (cases)
0
0 (0)
> 0.999
Postoperative abdominal infection (cases)
1 (0.38)
0 (0)
> 0.999
Postoperative respiratory tract infection (cases)
3 (1.15)
1 (0.38)
0.624
Postoperative electrocoagulation syndrome (cases)
8 (3.08)
1 (0.38)
0.037
Table 3 Comparison of treatment outcomes between the two groups
Control group (n = 260)
Study group (n = 260)
P value
Operative time (min)
54.00 ± 9.47
33.49 ± 8.46
< 0.001
Length of hospital stay (d)
5.04 ± 1.46
5.24 ± 1.45
0.117
Hospitalization expenses (RMB)
16111.40 ± 3709.71
14435.25 ± 3458.43
< 0.001
Materials expenses (RMB)
4115.81 ± 1486.70
3571.96 ± 1507.32
< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of follow-up results between the two groups
Control group (n = 260)
Study group (n = 260)
P value
Mean postoperative follow-up time (mo)
3.51 ± 4.26
3.23 ± 4.07
0.457
Postoperative recurrence (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Postoperative metastasis (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Postoperative death (cases)
0
0
> 0.999
Citation: Lin XM, Peng YM, Zeng HT, Yang JX, Xu ZL. Endoscopic “calabash” ligation and resection for small gastric mesenchymal tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(10): 545-556