Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2024; 16(10): 545-556
Published online Oct 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545
Published online Oct 16, 2024. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups
Characteristic | Control group (n = 260) | Study group (n = 260) | P value | |
Gender | Male/female | 95/165 | 99/161 | 0.717 |
Age (years) | 53.01 ± 10.37 | 52.23 ± 11.92 | 0.428 | |
Tumor location | Gastric fundus/gastric body | 143/117 | 146/114 | 0.791 |
Tumor long diameter | 6.72 ± 2.22 | 6.53 ± 2.16 | 0.320 | |
Tumor growth pattern | Endoluminal/partially exophytic | 253/7 | 253/7 | > 0.999 |
Tumor pathological type | Leiomyoma | 161 | 139 | 0.062 |
Schwannoma | 0 | 1 | > 0.999 | |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | 99 | 120 | 0.076 | |
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk stratification | Very low risk | 98 | 120 | 0.452 |
Low risk | 1 | 0 | ||
Intermediate risk | 0 | 0 | ||
High risk | 0 | 0 |
Table 2 Comparison of treatment results and complications between the two groups, n (%)
Control group (n = 260) | Study group (n = 260) | P value | ||
Endoscopic treatment outcomes | Complete resection (cases) | 260 | 260 | > 0.999 |
Incomplete resection (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 | |
Intraoperative complications | Intraoperative bleeding (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 |
Intraoperative perforation (cases) | 28 (3.08) | 3 (1.15) | < 0.001 | |
Intraoperative endoscopic examination failure and conversion to open surgery (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 | |
Postoperative complications | Postoperative abdominal pain score (points) | 0.25 ± 0.56 | 0.16 ± 0.43 | 0.029 |
Postoperative delayed bleeding (cases) | 1 (0.38) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 | |
Average volume of red blood cell suspension transfused (U) | 2 | 0 | 0.318 | |
Postoperative delayed perforation (cases) | 0 | 0 (0) | > 0.999 | |
Postoperative abdominal infection (cases) | 1 (0.38) | 0 (0) | > 0.999 | |
Postoperative respiratory tract infection (cases) | 3 (1.15) | 1 (0.38) | 0.624 | |
Postoperative electrocoagulation syndrome (cases) | 8 (3.08) | 1 (0.38) | 0.037 |
Table 3 Comparison of treatment outcomes between the two groups
Control group (n = 260) | Study group (n = 260) | P value | |
Operative time (min) | 54.00 ± 9.47 | 33.49 ± 8.46 | < 0.001 |
Length of hospital stay (d) | 5.04 ± 1.46 | 5.24 ± 1.45 | 0.117 |
Hospitalization expenses (RMB) | 16111.40 ± 3709.71 | 14435.25 ± 3458.43 | < 0.001 |
Materials expenses (RMB) | 4115.81 ± 1486.70 | 3571.96 ± 1507.32 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of follow-up results between the two groups
Control group (n = 260) | Study group (n = 260) | P value | |
Mean postoperative follow-up time (mo) | 3.51 ± 4.26 | 3.23 ± 4.07 | 0.457 |
Postoperative recurrence (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 |
Postoperative metastasis (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 |
Postoperative death (cases) | 0 | 0 | > 0.999 |
- Citation: Lin XM, Peng YM, Zeng HT, Yang JX, Xu ZL. Endoscopic “calabash” ligation and resection for small gastric mesenchymal tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16(10): 545-556
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v16/i10/545.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i10.545