Study of wrist-ankle acupuncture therapy for optimizing anaesthesia scheme of painless gastroscopy and improving painless gastroscopy related complications

Table 1 Comparison of the general data of the two groups of patients

Group	Gender		ASA grade		Median age (age)
	Male	Female	I	II
Observation group (n = 100)	54	46	80	20	36 (19-56)
Control group (n = 100)	52	58	82	18	41 (21-62)
χ2/t value	0.296		0.530		0.396
P value	> 0.05		> 0.05		> 0.05

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologist.

Table 2 Comparison of gastroscopy in the two groups

Group	Operation time (min)	Wakeup time (min)	Self-ambulation time (min)	Total dose of propofol (mg)
Observation group (n = 100)	4.73 ± 2.41	3.26 ± 0.27	6.12 ± 0.26	109 ± 8.17
Control group (n = 100)	4.35 ± 2.33	6.71 ± 0.34	7.08 ± 0.61	149 ± 10.17
t value	0.487	4.250	3.129	6.213
P value	> 0.05	< 0.01	< 0.05	< 0.01

Table 3 Comparison of complications between the two groups during anaesthesia [n (%)]

Group	Hypoxemia	Hypotension	Hiccup	F value	P value
Observation group (n = 100)	16 (16.00)	23 (23.00)	1 (1.00)	14.89	< 0.05
Control group ( n = 100)	21 (21.00)	30 (30.00)	13 (13.00)

Table 4 Comparison of gastrointestinal reactions between the two groups after examination [n (%)]

Group	Nausea	Vomiting	Abdominal distension	Abdominal pain	F value	P value
Observation group (n = 100)	11 (11.00)	8 (8.00)	6 (1.00)	5 (5.00)	12.89	< 0.05
Control group (n = 100)	20 (20.00)	16 (16.00)	15 (0.00)	12 (12.00)

Table 5 Comparison of visual analog scale scores for the satisfaction of operators and patients with painless gastroscopy

Group	VAS score of operator satisfaction	VAS score of patient satisfaction
Observation group (n = 100)	9.89 ± 0.31	8.45 ± 1.54
Control group (n = 100)	9.19 ± 1.02	8.28 ± 1.05
t value	0.596	2.471
P value	> 0.05	> 0.05

VAS: Visual analog scale.