Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2020; 12(1): 33-41
Published online Jan 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i1.33
Table 1 Patient background
Number of patients (%)
Sex (male/female)106 (49.3)/109 (50.7)
Age group
< 15 yr2 (0.9)
15-59 yr77 (35.8)
60-79 yr109 (50.7)
> 79 yr27(12.6)
Outpatient/inpatient180 (83.7)/35 (16.3)
Table 2 Foreign body type and retrieved location
Number of patients (%)
Foreign body type
PTP medications72 (33.5)
Food bolus47 (21.9)
Anisakis parasite41 (19.1)
Dental prosthesis23 (10.7)
Fish bone9 (4.2)
Video capsule device7 (3.3)
Spoon3 (1.4)
Others13 (6.0)
Location
Laryngopharynx5 (2.3)
Esophagus130 (60.5)
Stomach68 (31.6)
Small intestine8 (3.7)
Colon4 (1.9)
Table 3 Common foreign bodies at each anatomical location
Anatomical locationMost common foreign bodies (number/total number)%
LaryngopharynxPTP (2/5)40.0
Dental prosthesis (2/5)40.0
EsophagusPTP (63/130)48.5
Food bolus (47/130)36.2
StomachAnisakis parasite (39/68)57.4
Dental prosthesis (9/68)13.2
PTP (7/68)10.3
Small intestineDental prosthesis (3/8)37.5
Video capsule device (2/8)25.0
ColonVideo capsule device (3/4)75.0
Table 4 Procedure type and time
Number of patients (%)
Procedure type
EGD207 (96.3)
CS3 (1.4)
SBE5 (2.3)
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)
Laryngopharynx14.2 ± 2.7
Esophagus14.5 ± 1.1
Stomach14.7 ± 1.3
Small intestine31.1 ± 1.0
Colon45.2 ± 2.7
Table 5 Foreign bodies and devices most used for extraction
Foreign body typeDevice (number/total number)Percentage (%)
PTPLarge caliber transparent cap and grasping forceps (60/72)83.3
Food bolusGrasping forceps (36/47)76.5
Anisakis parasiteBiopsy forceps (40/41)97.5
Dental prosthesisLarge caliber transparent cap and grasping forceps (17/23)73.9
Fish boneLarge caliber transparent cap and grasping forceps (8/9)88.8
Capsule deviceNet retriever (6/7)85.7
SpoonOver-tube and polypectomy snare (2/3)66.6