Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2019; 11(2): 95-102
Published online Feb 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.95
Published online Feb 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.95
Table 1 Summary of the main characteristics of the included studies (study design, population, intervention, radiofrequency ablation probe, outcomes, main findings)
Author (reference), Country, Year | Patients number | Study design | Intervention | Probe | Tumour type | Control group | Outcomes | Main findings |
Steel et al[17], UK 2011 | 22 | Prospective | ERFA before SEMS | Habib EndoHPB | CC, PC | No | Technical and clinical success; adverse events | (1) 21/22 technical success; 18/21 stent patency at 90 d; and (2) 3 AE (1 pancreatitis, 2 cholecystitis) |
Figueroa- Barojas et al[18], USA 2013 | 20 | Prospective | ERFA before stenting (metallic or plastic) | Habib EndoHPB | MBO | No | 30 d patency, stricture size; adverse events | (1) Significant increase of 3.5 mm CBD diameter after RFA; and (2) 2 AE (1 pancreatitis, 1 cholecystitis) |
Dolak et al[19], Austria 2014 | 58 | Retrospective | Miscellaneous (ERFA before stenting, ERFA for blocked SEMS, percutaneous RFA) | Habib EndoHPB | MBO (mainly CC) | No | Patency, adverse events, mortality | (1) Median stent patency 170 d (95%CI 63-277): Metal vs plastic stenting (218 d vs 115 d, P = 0.051); and (2) 12 AE (1 partial liver infarction, 5 Cholangitis, 2 hemobilia, 2 cholangiosepsis, 1 hepatic coma, 1 left bundle branch block) |
Sharaiha et al[20], USA 2014 | 66 | Retrospective | ERFA before stenting (26pts) vs stenting alone (40 pts) | Habib EndoHPB | CC, PC | Yes | Survival, stricture size; Adverse events | (1) ERFA independent predictor of survival [HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), P = 0.012]; and (2) No differences in AE (2 RFA vs 3 no-RFA) |
Strand et al[21], USA 2014 | 48 | Retrospective | ERFA (16 pts) vs PDT (32 pts) | Habib EndoHPB | CC | Yes | Survival; Adverse events | Similar survival; more stent occlusions in RFA group |
Kallis et al[22], UK 2015 | 69 | Retrospective | ERFA before stenting (23 pts) vs stenting alone (46 pts) | Habib EndoHPB | PC | Yes | Survival, morbidity, and stent patency rates | Median survival in RFA group 226 d vs 123.5 d in controls (P < 0.01); SEMS patency equivalent |
Sharaiha et al[23], USA 2015 | 69 | Retrospective (multicentric registry) | Miscellaneous (mainly ERFA before stenting) | Habib EndoHPB | MBO (mainly CC) | No | Survival; Adverse events | (1) Median survival 11.46 mo (6.2 mo-25 mo); and (2) AE 10 % (1 pancreatitis 2 cholecystitis, 1 hemobilia, 3 abdominal pain) |
Laleman et al[24], Belgium 2017 | 18 | Prospective | ERFA before stenting | ELRA | CC, PC | No | Feasibility, safety, and biliary patency rate of a new RFA device | (1) Biliary patency 80% and 69% at 90 d and 180 d respectively; and (2) 6 AE (4 cholangitis, 2 pancreatitis) |
Yang et al[25], China 2018 | 65 | RCT | ERFA before stenting (32 pts) vs stenting alone (33 pts) | Habib EndoHPB | CC | Yes | Overall survival, biliary patency; post-ERCP AE | (1) OS RFA + stent vs the stent-only (13.2 mo ± 0.6 mo vs 8.3 mo ± 0.5 mo, P < 0.001); Biliary patency RFA + stent longer than stent-only (6.8 mo vs 3.4 mo, P = 0.02); and (2) Similar AE [6.3% (2/32) vs 9.1% (3/33), P = 0.67] |
- Citation: Auriemma F, De Luca L, Bianchetti M, Repici A, Mangiavillano B. Radiofrequency and malignant biliary strictures: An update. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(2): 95-102
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v11/i2/95.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.95