BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2018; 10(1): 16-22
Published online Jan 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i1.16
Table 1 Patient characteristics
n = 38
Men/women21/17
Age (yr)70 (52-90)
PS (0/1/2)8/21/9
Diagnosis
Pancreatic cancer36
Bile duct cancer1
Metastatic nodes1
Clinical stage III/IV1/37
Tumor size (mm)33 (13-70)
Length of the biliary stricture (mm)27 (10-60)
Maximum diameter of the proximal bile duct (mm)13.5 (7-20)
Table 2 Results of stent placement
n (%)
Technical success38 (100)
Functional success38 (100)
Selected stent length (60/80 mm)14/24 (36.8/63.2)
Endoscopic sphincterotomy20 (52.6)
Previous drainage (RBD/NBD)9/2 (23.7/5.3)
Replacement for CSEMS5 (13.2)
Table 3 Retrograde biliary drainage, time to retrograde biliary drainage, and survival time
n (%)
RBO2 (5.3)
Tumor ingrowth1 (2.6)
Tumor overgrowth1 (2.6)
Median TRBO (d)190 (164-215)
Non-obstruction rates of 3, 6, 12 mo (%)100, 91, 78
Median survival time (d)120 (18-502)
Table 4 Complications other than recurrent biliary obstruction
Complications11/38 (28.9%)Time to event (d)
Acute cholecystitis4 (10.3)3, 32, 217, 487
PEP3 (7.9)1 (each)
Hemorrhage2 (5.3)92, 119
Fever without exacerbation of liver injury1 (2.6)1
Liver abscess1 (2.6)17


Write to the Help Desk