Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2018; 10(10): 225-238
Published online Oct 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i10.225
Figure 1
Figure 1 NYU Winthrop esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection experience. A: ESD characteristics and histopathology; B: Histology of lesions; C: Learning effect on procedure time; D: Learning effect on R0 resection rate. AEs: Adverse events; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer (NYU-Winthrop).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection difficulty by location. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Relative endoscopic submucosal dissection difficulty by location. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EGJ: Esophagogastric junction.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Chronology of endoscopic submucosal dissection development in a Western Center. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; STER: submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection; EFTR: endoscopic full-thickness resection.
Figure 6
Figure 6 NYU-Winthrop endoscopic submucosal dissection experiences. A: ESD pathology; B: ESD R0 rates; C: UGI ESD dissection speed. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Traction in endoscopic submucosal dissection. A: Traction via clip on string; B: Traction via pulley effect with two clips.