BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Guo LH, Hu KF, Miao M, Ding Y, Zhang XJ, Ye GL. Endoscopic resection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: Clinicopathologic characteristics and risk factors for treatment outcomes. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(6): 106412 [PMID: 40547554 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.106412]
Reader's ID:
08628847
Submitted on:
June 20, 2025, 09:41
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This paper provides valuable insights into the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcomes of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) treated with endoscopic resection techniques. The study identifies key predictive factors such as tumor size, morphology, and histological grade, which are associated with high-grade dysplasia, carcinoma, and submucosal invasion. The development of a nomogram model that incorporates these factors is a significant contribution, offering a practical tool for predicting treatment outcomes. However, the study is retrospective, and its applicability to broader clinical settings could be improved with prospective, multi-center trials. Despite this, the paper’s detailed analysis of risk factors and its proposed nomogram for predicting clinical outcomes provide valuable guidance for clinical practice and future research in the field of colorectal cancer prevention and treatment.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.