Xiang Y, Yuan Y, Wang ZY, Zhu YM, Li WY, Ye QG, Wang YN, Sun Q, Ding XW, Longi F, Tang DH, Xu GF. Comorbidities related to metachronous recurrence for early gastric cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(3): 99540 [PMID: 40125504 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.99540]
Reader's ID:
08478088
Submitted on:
March 22, 2025, 08:37
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This study provides novel insights into the risk factors for metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) in elderly patients, particularly highlighting the clinical significance of the association with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the proposed risk stratification system. However, the retrospective design and small sample size limit the robustness of the evidence, necessitating further validation through multicenter prospective studies. The paper is well-structured but requires refinement in statistical details.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.