For: | Cosma S, Petruzzelli P, Danese S, Benedetto C. Nerve preserving vs standard laparoscopic sacropexy: Postoperative bowel function. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(5): 211-219 [PMID: 28572875 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i5.211] |
---|---|
URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i5/211.htm |
Number | Citing Articles |
1 |
Shingo Moriyama, Kazue Ogawa, Tetsuo Shinozaki, Kazuhisa Hagiwara, Satoshi Kida, Daiji Fujimori, Ryuji Tabata, Yohei Kawashima, Mamoru Fukuda, Kiichiro Fujita, Yuji Kato, Satoshi Sato. SHORT-TERM SURGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION. The Japanese Journal of Urology 2022; 113(3): 96 doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.113.96
|
2 |
Ryosuke Kawano, Kanako Gondo, Tomoaki Fukagawa, Tomoyuki Fujita, Teruyuki Yoshimitsu. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY 2019; 35(2): 409 doi: 10.5180/jsgoe.35.2_409
|
3 |
Jeffrey S. Schachar, Catherine A. Matthews. Updates in Minimally Invasive Approaches to Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2019; 8(2): 26 doi: 10.1007/s13669-019-0257-7
|
4 |
Stefano Cosma, Domenico Ferraioli, Marco Mitidieri, Marcello Ceccaroni, Paolo Zola, Leonardo Micheletti, Chiara Benedetto. A simplified fascial model of pelvic anatomical surgery: going beyond parametrium-centered surgical anatomy. Anatomical Science International 2021; 96(1): 20 doi: 10.1007/s12565-020-00553-z
|
5 |
Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Isabell Koerting, Esther Ruess, Ivo Faehnle, Jörg Krebs. Functional outcome after laparoscopic nerve‐sparing sacrocolpopexy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2018; 97(6): 744 doi: 10.1111/aogs.13337
|
6 |
Grégoire Rocher, Henri Azaïs, Amélia Favier, Catherine Uzan, Mathieu Castela, Gaby Moawad, Vincent Lavoué, Xavier Morandi, Krystel Nyangoh Timoh, Geoffroy Canlorbe. Relationships between pelvic nerves and levator ani muscle for posterior sacrocolpopexy: an anatomic study. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 2022; 44(6): 891 doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-02955-2
|
7 |
M.G. Melo, R Botchorishvili. Pelvic anatomy in laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: dissect your success. Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn 2022; 14(4): 335 doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.4.047
|
8 |
Vincenzo Li Marzi, Simone Morselli, Fabrizio Di Maida, Stefania Musco, Luca Gemma, Francesco Bracco, Riccardo Tellini, Gianni Vittori, Andrea Mari, Riccardo Campi, Marco Carini, Sergio Serni, Andrea Minervini. Robot-assisted sacro(hystero)colpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh placement: impact on lower bowel tract function and clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Therapeutic Advances in Urology 2022; 14 doi: 10.1177/17562872221090884
|
9 |
Auran Rosanne B. Cortes, Tokumasa Hayashi, Masayoshi Nomura, Yugo Sawada, Shino Tokiwa, Mika Nagae. Medium term anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. International Urogynecology Journal 2022; 33(11): 3111 doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05076-x
|
10 |
Myeong Jin Ko, Seung Won Park, Seong Hyun Wui. An Anatomical Clue for Minimizing Iliac Vein Injury During the Anterolateral Approach at L5–S1 Level: A Cadaveric Study. Neurospine 2021; 18(4): 833 doi: 10.14245/ns.2142494.247
|
11 |
Javier Magrina, Jie Yang, Johnny Yi, Megan Wasson. Nerve-sparing in Gynecologic Surgery: A Perspective. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2021; 28(3): 475 doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.009
|
12 |
Gonca Coban Serbetcioglu, Seda Yuksel Simsek, Songul Alemdaroglu, Pinar Caglar Aytac, Hakan Kalayci, Husnu Celik. Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction 2020; 49(7): 101795 doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101795
|
13 |
Tae-Hyun Kim. Robotic sacrocolpopexy with nerve sparing dissection technique. Gynecologic Robotic Surgery 2023; 4(1): 26 doi: 10.36637/grs.2023.00171
|