Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2014; 20(12): 3059-3068
Published online Mar 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3059
Published online Mar 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3059
WHO | RECIST 1.1 | EASL | mRECIST | |
Complete response (CR) | Disappearance of all lesions | Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes | Disappearance of intratumoral areterial enhancement | Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes |
Partial response (PR) | ≥ 50% decrease in the sum of the area (longest diameters multiplied by longest perpendicular diameters) | ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters | ≥ 50% decrease in the sum of the arterial enhancing areas (longest diameters multiplied by longest perpendicular diameters) | At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the target lesions |
Stable disease (SD) | Neither PR nor PD | Neither PR nor PD | Neither PR nor PD | Neither PR nor PD |
Progressive disease (PD) | ≥ 25% increase in the sum of the area | ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters and ≥ 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of the longest diameters | ≥ 25% increase in the size of the arterial enhancing areas or development of a new lesions | ≥ 20% increase in the sum of diameters of viable target lesions recorded since treatment started or development of new lesions |
EORTC | PERCIST | |
CMR | Complete resolution of 18F-FDG uptake within the tumor volume so that it is indistinguishable from surrounding normal tissue | Complete resolution of 18F-FDG uptake within measurable target lesion so that the liver activity was less than the mean and indistinguishable from surrounding background blood-pool levels plus disappearance of all other lesions to background blood pool levels and appearance of no new 18F-FDG-avid lesions |
PMR | Minimum 15%-25% reduction in tumor 18F-FDG SUV after 1 chemotherapy cycle and > 25% reduction after ≥ 1 treatment cycle; reduction in extent of tumor 18F-FDG uptake not required | ≥ 30% relative and ≥ 0.8 SUL unit absolute reduction in target measurable tumor 18F-FDG SUL peak and no increase > 30% in SUL or size (per RECIST) of target or nontarget lesions or appearance of new lesions; reduction in extent of tumor 18F-FDG uptake not required ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters |
SMD | < 25% increase or < 15% decrease in tumor 18F-FDG SUV and no visible increase in extent of 18F-FDG tumor uptake (> 20% in the longest dimension) | Not CMR, PMR, nor PMD |
PMD | > 25% increase in 18F-FDG tumor SUV within the tumor region defined on the baseline examination or visible increase in the extent of 18F-FDG tumor uptake (> 20% in the longest dimension) or appearance of new 18F-FDG uptake in metastatic lesions | > 30% increase in 18F-FDG SUL peak, with > 0.8 SUL unit increase in tumor SUV peak from baseline scan in pattern typical of tumor and not of infection/treatment effect or visible increase in extent of 18F-FDG tumor uptake (75% in total lesion glycolysis volume with no decline in SUL) or new 18F-FDG-avid lesions typical of cancer and not related to treatment effect or infection |
- Citation: Hayano K, Fuentes-Orrego JM, Sahani DV. New approaches for precise response evaluation in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(12): 3059-3068
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i12/3059.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3059