BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Podzolkova VA, Geppe NA, Glazyrina AA, Valieva SI, Avrusin IS, Kurbanova SK, Vakhlyarskaya SS, Kostina YO, Yudina VT, Lagutina EA, Osminina MK, Zholobova ES, Podchernyaeva NS, Turginekova EP, Sorokina LS, Davtian SA, Kostik MM. Does Takayasu arteritis differ between children and adolescents? Insights from a Russian multicenter cohort. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 120832 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.120832]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Esteemed Editors and Team of the World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, I am profoundly grateful to you and your esteemed team for granting me the honor of contributing to this prestigious academic platform. Publishing in your esteemed journal has been a significant achievement in my professional career, and I am deeply honored that my work met your stringent standards. The peer review process has been immensely beneficial to me. The reviewers' insightful comments and constructive criticism significantly enhanced the clarity and strength of my arguments. Their expertise and meticulous attention to detail greatly improved the final manuscript, and I sincerely appreciate the time and effort they dedicated to my work. I found the feedback to be both rigorous and supportive, which is a rarity in academic publishing. I would also like to acknowledge the editorial team for their clear communication, timely responses, and expert guidance throughout the publication process. From initial submission to final proofs, your professionalism ensured a smooth and stress-free experience. It is evident that the journal's success is founded on the dedication of its staff, and I am grateful for the care and attention given to my manuscript. Your journal is instrumental in advancing knowledge in our field, and I greatly admire your commitment to academic integrity and to promoting meaningful research. Being a part of this community holds immense value for me, and I look forward to continuing to follow your publications and, ideally, contributing to them in the future. Thank you again for your trust, support, and the invaluable opportunity to share my research with such a wide and engaged audience. I eagerly anticipate witnessing the journal's continued growth and success. With heartfelt gratitude, On behalf of the Authors Mikhail Kostik