BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Alexeeva EI, Shingarova MS, Dvoryakovskaya TM, Isaeva KB, Chomakhidze AM, Fetisova AN, Chibisova KV, Krekhova EA, Kriulin IA, Kriulina TY, Tsulukiya IT, Botova MS, Kondratyeva NM, Kokina MY, Makunc AA, Dostiev NA, Savostyanov KV, Pushkov AA, Zhanin IS, Demyanov DS, Kostik MM. Clinical and laboratory manifestations and treatment of children with TNFRSF1A gene variants. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 119428 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.119428]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Dear Editors and Team of World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics I would like to express my deepest and most sincere gratitude to your journal for the opportunity to publish my work. The experience of collaborating with your team has been truly invaluable, and I am profoundly thankful for the professionalism, dedication, and thoughtful guidance demonstrated at every stage of the publication process. From the initial submission to the final version, your editorial team provided clear, constructive, and highly insightful feedback that significantly strengthened the quality of my article. The peer review process was exceptionally thorough; the reviewers’ comments were not only rigorous but also remarkably supportive, offering precise suggestions that helped me clarify my arguments and deepen my analysis. I particularly appreciate how the feedback encouraged me to revisit certain methodological assumptions and articulate my conclusions with greater precision. The administrative support was equally outstanding. Your staff handled all logistical aspects with remarkable efficiency and patience, promptly responding to my questions and guiding me through each step with clarity and kindness. This level of attentiveness greatly eased the publishing journey and allowed me to focus on refining the academic content. Moreover, I am grateful for your journal’s commitment to high scholarly standards and its role in fostering meaningful academic dialogue. Being part of such a reputable platform is a great honour, and I believe the visibility and credibility your journal provides will help my research reach the audience it is intended for. I am confident that the wide readership and rigorous editorial oversight will contribute to a productive discussion around the topic I explored. I also wish to acknowledge the broader impact of your journal within the academic community. Its consistent emphasis on methodological rigour, ethical research practices, and clear communication sets a valuable example for scholars at all career stages. It is inspiring to see how your publication not only disseminates knowledge but also actively shapes the quality of discourse in our field. Thank you once again for your trust in my work and for the exceptional support you provided throughout the entire process. I am truly honoured to be published in your journal, and I sincerely hope for the opportunity to contribute to its pages again in the future. With warmest regards, Mikhail Kostik, MD, PhD, Professor