Le KL, Dinh TT, Thai KP, Pham TN, Tran MQ, Pham PC, Trinh MT, Duong NNQ, Nguyen TK, Le NK, Mai-Phan TA. Bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: Incidence and associated factors in a Vietnamese tertiary center. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120929 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120929]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We were very satisfied with our experience working with the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The peer-review process was rigorous, thorough, and constructive, and the comments from the editors and reviewers substantially improved the scientific quality and presentation of our manuscript. Although the process took somewhat longer than expected, the careful and transparent editorial handling gave us confidence in the integrity and final quality of our published article. We sincerely thank the publisher, the editorial team, and the reviewers for their professionalism, dedication, and valuable contributions.