Ren SQ, Huang ZL, Qiu ZX, Cai C. Systemic immune-inflammation index and serum lactoferrin: A novel tool for individualized prognostic assessment in elderly colon cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(5): 114634 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i5.114634]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
As a researcher, I am satisfied with this journal's review process. It was efficient and transparent. The handling was timely and thorough. The reviewers gave constructive feedback that improved my manuscript. The editorial office responded quickly to queries and kept me informed at every stage. I appreciate their courtesy and rigor. Overall, the review process exceeded my expectations. I will recommend this journal to my colleagues and friends for their future submissions.