Wang WF, Qiao ZY, Li Z, Zheng KZ, Sun DQ, Sheng MH. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stump fistula after choledochojejunostomy: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(8): 120911 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.120911]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
My experience with World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery was genuinely positive. The handling editor assigned reviewers who clearly read our manuscript carefully—their comments on our laparoscopic technique were sharp and improved the final paper. The revision timeline was reasonable, and the production team answered queries within 24 hours. Publishing open access here gave our work immediate visibility among practising surgeons. I would not hesitate to submit again, and I already recommend it to colleagues working on hepatobiliary and colorectal topics.