BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Jiang ZY, Liu RQ, Tang MJ, Fan HD, Yang WJ, Gong L, Mi XX, Shi JP. Early-onset hepatic fibrosis linking to a novel PYROXD2 mutation: A case report. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(5): 118622 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i5.118622]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to the entire editorial team for their invaluable contributions—including the assistant editor, editor, peer reviewers, editorial director, editor-in-chief, language editor, and production editor. Your collective expertise, dedication, and meticulous attention to detail have been instrumental in shaping this work. I also wish to express deep appreciation to the expert reviewers for their constructive and enlightening comments, which have been extremely valuable and inspiring throughout this process. Their professional guidance significantly elevated the quality and improved the standard of this research. I feel deeply honored to have received such insightful feedback and am grateful for the considerable efforts made by the entire editorial staff throughout the peer review process. Once again, thank you for your outstanding contributions to this publication and warmest congratulations on the successful launch of this journal!